| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
d678a59d |
|
18-May-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Revert "Merge patch series "arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay Ethernet""
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
301bac60 |
|
27-Apr-2024 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
cmd: Remove <common.h> and add needed includes
Remove <common.h> from all "cmd/" files and when needed add
missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
63de067a |
|
04-Feb-2022 |
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> |
cmd: wrong printf() code in do_test_stackprot_fail()
strlen() returns size_t. So we should use %zu to print it.
This avoids incorrect output on 32bit systems.
Fixes: 2fc62f299174 ("stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
2fc62f29 |
|
24-May-2021 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
stackprot: Make our test a bit more complex
With better compiler optimizations available, a compiler may see we do
nothing with our buffer after calling memset and omit the call, thus
causing us to not smash the stack. Add a comment to explain why we now
also have a printf call, so that the test will pass as the memset will
not be omitted.
Reported-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|
| #
4e9bce12 |
|
11-Apr-2021 |
Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com> |
Add support for stack-protector
Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL
as well as new pytest for stackprotector
Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.peshkin@broadcom.com>
Adjust UEFI build flags.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
|