History log of /linux-master/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_getset_retval_setsockopt.c
Revision Date Author Comments
# 495d2d81 26-Dec-2023 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

selftests/bpf: Attempt to build BPF programs with -Wsign-compare

GCC's -Wall includes -Wsign-compare while clang does not.
Since BPF programs are built with clang we need to add this flag explicitly
to catch problematic comparisons like:

int i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is false.

long i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is true.

C standard for reference:

- If either operand is unsigned long the other shall be converted to unsigned long.

- Otherwise, if one operand is a long int and the other unsigned int, then if a
long int can represent all the values of an unsigned int, the unsigned int
shall be converted to a long int; otherwise both operands shall be converted to
unsigned long int.

- Otherwise, if either operand is long, the other shall be converted to long.

- Otherwise, if either operand is unsigned, the other shall be converted to unsigned.

Unfortunately clang's -Wsign-compare is very noisy.
It complains about (s32)a == (u32)b which is safe and doen't have surprising behavior.

This patch fixes some of the issues. It needs a follow up to fix the rest.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231226191148.48536-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com


# e01b4a72 11-May-2023 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

selftests/bpf: Correctly handle optlen > 4096

Even though it's not relevant in selftests, the people
might still copy-paste from them. So let's take care
of optlen > 4096 cases explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230511170456.1759459-4-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>


# b8bff6f8 15-Dec-2021 YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>

selftests/bpf: Test bpf_{get,set}_retval behavior with cgroup/sockopt

The tests checks how different ways of interacting with the helpers
(getting retval, setting EUNATCH, EISCONN, and legacy reject
returning 0 without setting retval), produce different results in
both the setsockopt syscall and the retval returned by the helper.
A few more tests verify the interaction between the retval of the
helper and the retval in getsockopt context.

Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/43ec60d679ae3f4f6fd2460559c28b63cb93cd12.1639619851.git.zhuyifei@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>