samples/bpf: unify bpf program suffix to .bpf with tracing programs

Currently, BPF programs typically have a suffix of .bpf.c. However,
some programs still utilize a mixture of _kern.c suffix alongside the
naming convention. In order to achieve consistency in the naming of
these programs, this commit unifies the inconsistency in the naming
convention of BPF kernel programs.

Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230818090119.477441-4-danieltimlee@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

samples: bpf: Replace sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]) with ARRAY_SIZE

The ARRAY_SIZE macro is more compact and more formal in linux source.

Signed-off-by: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220712072302.13761-1-xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn

samples/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK

We have switched to memcg-based memory accouting and thus the rlimit is
not needed any more. LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was introduced in
libbpf for backward compatibility, so we can use it instead now.

This patch also removes the useless header sys/resource.h from many files
in samples/bpf.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220409125958.92629-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com

bpf: samples: Do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK

Since bpf is not using rlimit memlock for the memory accounting
and control, do not change the limit in sample applications.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201201215900.3569844-35-guro@fb.com

samples, bpf: Replace bpf_program__title() with bpf_program__section_name()

From commit 521095842027 ("libbpf: Deprecate notion of BPF program
"title" in favor of "section name""), the term title has been replaced
with section name in libbpf.

Since the bpf_program__title() has been deprecated, this commit
switches this function to bpf_program__section_name(). Due to
this commit, the compilation warning issue has also been resolved.

Fixes: 521095842027 ("libbpf: Deprecate notion of BPF program "title" in favor of "section name"")
Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200904063434.24963-1-danieltimlee@gmail.com

samples, bpf: Refactor tail call user progs with libbpf

BPF tail call uses the BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY type map for calling
into other BPF programs and this PROG_ARRAY should be filled prior to
use. Currently, samples with the PROG_ARRAY type MAP fill this program
array with bpf_load. For bpf_load to fill this map, kernel BPF program
must specify the section with specific format of <prog_type>/<array_idx>
(e.g. SEC("socket/0"))

But by using libbpf instead of bpf_load, user program can specify which
programs should be added to PROG_ARRAY. The advantage of this approach
is that you can selectively add only the programs you want, rather than
adding all of them to PROG_ARRAY, and it's much more intuitive than the
traditional approach.

This commit refactors user programs with the PROG_ARRAY type MAP with
libbpf instead of using bpf_load.

Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200516040608.1377876-4-danieltimlee@gmail.com

samples, bpf: Move read_trace_pipe to trace_helpers

To reduce the reliance of trace samples (trace*_user) on bpf_load,
move read_trace_pipe to trace_helpers. By moving this bpf_loader helper
elsewhere, trace functions can be easily migrated to libbbpf.

Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200321100424.1593964-2-danieltimlee@gmail.com

samples: bpf: include bpf/bpf.h instead of local libbpf.h

There are two files in the tree called libbpf.h which is becoming
problematic. Most samples don't actually need the local libbpf.h
they simply include it to get to bpf/bpf.h. Include bpf/bpf.h
directly instead.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.

By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.

Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.

This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.

How this work was done:

Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,

Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.

The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.

The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).

All documentation files were explicitly excluded.

The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.

- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.

For non */uapi/* files that summary was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139

and resulted in the first patch in this series.

If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930

and resulted in the second patch in this series.

- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:

SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1

and that resulted in the third patch in this series.

- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).

- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.

- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).

- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.

In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.

Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.

Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.

In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.

Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct

This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.

These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.

Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

bpf samples: update tracex5 sample to use __seccomp_filter

seccomp_phase1() does not exist anymore. Instead, update sample to use
__seccomp_filter(). While at it, set max locked memory to unlimited.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

samples/bpf: bpf_tail_call example for tracing

kprobe example that demonstrates how future seccomp programs may look like.
It attaches to seccomp_phase1() function and tail-calls other BPF programs
depending on syscall number.

Existing optimized classic BPF seccomp programs generated by Chrome look like:
if (sd.nr < 121) {
if (sd.nr < 57) {
if (sd.nr < 22) {
if (sd.nr < 7) {
if (sd.nr < 4) {
if (sd.nr < 1) {
check sys_read
} else {
if (sd.nr < 3) {
check sys_write and sys_open
} else {
check sys_close
}
}
} else {
} else {
} else {
} else {
} else {
}

the future seccomp using native eBPF may look like:
bpf_tail_call(&sd, &syscall_jmp_table, sd.nr);
which is simpler, faster and leaves more room for per-syscall checks.

Usage:
$ sudo ./tracex5
<...>-366 [001] d... 4.870033: : read(fd=1, buf=00007f6d5bebf000, size=771)
<...>-369 [003] d... 4.870066: : mmap
<...>-369 [003] d... 4.870077: : syscall=110 (one of get/set uid/pid/gid)
<...>-369 [003] d... 4.870089: : syscall=107 (one of get/set uid/pid/gid)
sh-369 [000] d... 4.891740: : read(fd=0, buf=00000000023d1000, size=512)
sh-369 [000] d... 4.891747: : write(fd=1, buf=00000000023d3000, size=512)
sh-369 [000] d... 4.891747: : read(fd=1, buf=00000000023d3000, size=512)

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>