History log of /linux-master/arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
Revision Date Author Comments
# 7f274e60 25-Mar-2024 Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Add new word for scattered features

Add a new word for scattered features because all free bits among the
existing Linux-defined auxiliary flags have been exhausted.

Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8380d2a0da469a1f0ad75b8954a79fb689599ff6.1711091584.git.sandipan.das@amd.com


# c3b86e61 25-Jan-2024 Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Enable/unmask SEV-SNP CPU feature

With all the required host changes in place, it should now be possible
to initialize SNP-related MSR bits, set up RMP table enforcement, and
initialize SNP support in firmware while maintaining legacy support for
SEV/SEV-ES guests. Go ahead and enable the SNP feature now.

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240126041126.1927228-23-michael.roth@amd.com


# b6e0f666 25-Jan-2024 Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Add SEV-SNP CPU feature

Add CPU feature detection for Secure Encrypted Virtualization with
Secure Nested Paging. This feature adds a strong memory integrity
protection to help prevent malicious hypervisor-based attacks like
data replay, memory re-mapping, and more.

Since enabling the SNP CPU feature imposes a number of additional
requirements on host initialization and handling legacy firmware APIs
for SEV/SEV-ES guests, only introduce the CPU feature bit so that the
relevant handling can be added, but leave it disabled via a
disabled-features mask.

Once all the necessary changes needed to maintain legacy SEV/SEV-ES
support are introduced in subsequent patches, the SNP feature bit will
be unmasked/enabled.

Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@profian.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240126041126.1927228-2-michael.roth@amd.com


# e554a8ca 05-Dec-2023 H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>

x86/fred: Disable FRED support if CONFIG_X86_FRED is disabled

Add CONFIG_X86_FRED to <asm/disabled-features.h> to make
cpu_feature_enabled() work correctly with FRED.

Originally-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Shan Kang <shan.kang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205105030.8698-8-xin3.li@intel.com


# 0911b8c5 21-Nov-2023 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

x86/bugs: Rename CONFIG_RETHUNK => CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK

Step 10/10 of the namespace unification of CPU mitigations related Kconfig options.

[ mingo: Added one more case. ]

Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121160740.1249350-11-leitao@debian.org


# ac61d439 21-Nov-2023 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

x86/bugs: Rename CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY => CONFIG_MITIGATION_UNRET_ENTRY

Step 7/10 of the namespace unification of CPU mitigations related Kconfig options.

Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121160740.1249350-8-leitao@debian.org


# aefb2f2e 21-Nov-2023 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

x86/bugs: Rename CONFIG_RETPOLINE => CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE

Step 5/10 of the namespace unification of CPU mitigations related Kconfig options.

[ mingo: Converted a few more uses in comments/messages as well. ]

Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ariel Miculas <amiculas@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121160740.1249350-6-leitao@debian.org


# ea4654e0 21-Nov-2023 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

x86/bugs: Rename CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION => CONFIG_MITIGATION_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION

Step 4/10 of the namespace unification of CPU mitigations related Kconfig options.

[ mingo: Converted new uses that got added since the series was posted. ]

Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121160740.1249350-5-leitao@debian.org


# 5fa31af3 21-Nov-2023 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

x86/bugs: Rename CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING => CONFIG_MITIGATION_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING

Step 3/10 of the namespace unification of CPU mitigations related Kconfig options.

Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121160740.1249350-4-leitao@debian.org


# a5f6c2ac 12-Jun-2023 Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>

x86/shstk: Add user control-protection fault handler

A control-protection fault is triggered when a control-flow transfer
attempt violates Shadow Stack or Indirect Branch Tracking constraints.
For example, the return address for a RET instruction differs from the copy
on the shadow stack.

There already exists a control-protection fault handler for handling kernel
IBT faults. Refactor this fault handler into separate user and kernel
handlers, like the page fault handler. Add a control-protection handler
for usermode. To avoid ifdeffery, put them both in a new file cet.c, which
is compiled in the case of either of the two CET features supported in the
kernel: kernel IBT or user mode shadow stack. Move some static inline
functions from traps.c into a header so they can be used in cet.c.

Opportunistically fix a comment in the kernel IBT part of the fault
handler that is on the end of the line instead of preceding it.

Keep the same behavior for the kernel side of the fault handler, except for
converting a BUG to a WARN in the case of a #CP happening when the feature
is missing. This unifies the behavior with the new shadow stack code, and
also prevents the kernel from crashing under this situation which is
potentially recoverable.

The control-protection fault handler works in a similar way as the general
protection fault handler. It provides the si_code SEGV_CPERR to the signal
handler.

Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-28-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com


# 701fb66d 12-Jun-2023 Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Add CPU feature flags for shadow stacks

The Control-Flow Enforcement Technology contains two related features,
one of which is Shadow Stacks. Future patches will utilize this feature
for shadow stack support in KVM, so add a CPU feature flags for Shadow
Stacks (CPUID.(EAX=7,ECX=0):ECX[bit 7]).

To protect shadow stack state from malicious modification, the registers
are only accessible in supervisor mode. This implementation
context-switches the registers with XSAVES. Make X86_FEATURE_SHSTK depend
on XSAVES.

The shadow stack feature, enumerated by the CPUID bit described above,
encompasses both supervisor and userspace support for shadow stack. In
near future patches, only userspace shadow stack will be enabled. In
expectation of future supervisor shadow stack support, create a software
CPU capability to enumerate kernel utilization of userspace shadow stack
support. This user shadow stack bit should depend on the HW "shstk"
capability and that logic will be implemented in future patches.

Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-9-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com


# e0bddc19 12-Mar-2023 Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

x86/mm: Reduce untagged_addr() overhead for systems without LAM

Use alternatives to reduce untagged_addr() overhead.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230312112612.31869-8-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com


# 8415a748 10-Jan-2023 Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>

x86/cpu, kvm: Add support for CPUID_80000021_EAX

Add support for CPUID leaf 80000021, EAX. The majority of the features will be
used in the kernel and thus a separate leaf is appropriate.

Include KVM's reverse_cpuid entry because features are used by VM guests, too.

[ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230124163319.2277355-2-kim.phillips@amd.com


# 80e4c1cd 15-Sep-2022 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

x86/retbleed: Add X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH

Intel SKL CPUs fall back to other predictors when the RSB underflows. The
only microcode mitigation is IBRS which is insanely expensive. It comes
with performance drops of up to 30% depending on the workload.

A way less expensive, but nevertheless horrible mitigation is to track the
call depth in software and overeagerly fill the RSB when returns underflow
the software counter.

Provide a configuration symbol and a CPU misfeature bit.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220915111147.056176424@infradead.org


# 15e15d64 04-Nov-2022 Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_XENPV to disabled-features.h

Add X86_FEATURE_XENPV to the features handled specially in
disabled-features.h.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104072701.20283-2-jgross@suse.com


# f43b9876 27-Jun-2022 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

x86/retbleed: Add fine grained Kconfig knobs

Do fine-grained Kconfig for all the various retbleed parts.

NOTE: if your compiler doesn't support return thunks this will
silently 'upgrade' your mitigation to IBPB, you might not like this.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>


# a149180f 14-Jun-2022 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

x86: Add magic AMD return-thunk

Note: needs to be in a section distinct from Retpolines such that the
Retpoline RET substitution cannot possibly use immediate jumps.

ORC unwinding for zen_untrain_ret() and __x86_return_thunk() is a
little tricky but works due to the fact that zen_untrain_ret() doesn't
have any stack ops and as such will emit a single ORC entry at the
start (+0x3f).

Meanwhile, unwinding an IP, including the __x86_return_thunk() one
(+0x40) will search for the largest ORC entry smaller or equal to the
IP, these will find the one ORC entry (+0x3f) and all works.

[ Alexandre: SVM part. ]
[ bp: Build fix, massages. ]

Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>


# 15e67227 14-Jun-2022 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

x86: Undo return-thunk damage

Introduce X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK for those afflicted with needing this.

[ bp: Do only INT3 padding - simpler. ]

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>


# 369ae6ff 14-Jun-2022 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

x86/retpoline: Cleanup some #ifdefery

On it's own not much of a cleanup but it prepares for more/similar
code.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>


# 59bd54a8 05-Apr-2022 Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

x86/tdx: Detect running as a TDX guest in early boot

In preparation of extending cc_platform_has() API to support TDX guest,
use CPUID instruction to detect support for TDX guests in the early
boot code (via tdx_early_init()). Since copy_bootdata() is the first
user of cc_platform_has() API, detect the TDX guest status before it.

Define a synthetic feature flag (X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST) and set this
bit in a valid TDX guest platform.

Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com


# dbae0a93 26-Jan-2022 Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

x86/cpu: Remove CONFIG_X86_SMAP and "nosmap"

Those were added as part of the SMAP enablement but SMAP is currently
an integral part of kernel proper and there's no need to disable it
anymore.

Rip out that functionality. Leave --uaccess default on for objtool as
this is what objtool should do by default anyway.

If still needed - clearcpuid=smap.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127115626.14179-4-bp@alien8.de


# 7c1ef591 07-Feb-2022 Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Re-enable ENQCMD

The ENQCMD feature can only be used if CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM is set.
Add X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD to the disabled features mask as appropriate so
that cpu_feature_enabled() can be used to check the feature.

[ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220207230254.3342514-10-fenghua.yu@intel.com


# 9bfecd05 29-May-2021 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

x86/cpufeatures: Force disable X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD and remove update_pasid()

While digesting the XSAVE-related horrors which got introduced with
the supervisor/user split, the recent addition of ENQCMD-related
functionality got on the radar and turned out to be similarly broken.

update_pasid(), which is only required when X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD is
available, is invoked from two places:

1) From switch_to() for the incoming task

2) Via a SMP function call from the IOMMU/SMV code

#1 is half-ways correct as it hacks around the brokenness of get_xsave_addr()
by enforcing the state to be 'present', but all the conditionals in that
code are completely pointless for that.

Also the invocation is just useless overhead because at that point
it's guaranteed that TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set on the incoming task
and all of this can be handled at return to user space.

#2 is broken beyond repair. The comment in the code claims that it is safe
to invoke this in an IPI, but that's just wishful thinking.

FPU state of a running task is protected by fregs_lock() which is
nothing else than a local_bh_disable(). As BH-disabled regions run
usually with interrupts enabled the IPI can hit a code section which
modifies FPU state and there is absolutely no guarantee that any of the
assumptions which are made for the IPI case is true.

Also the IPI is sent to all CPUs in mm_cpumask(mm), but the IPI is
invoked with a NULL pointer argument, so it can hit a completely
unrelated task and unconditionally force an update for nothing.
Worse, it can hit a kernel thread which operates on a user space
address space and set a random PASID for it.

The offending commit does not cleanly revert, but it's sufficient to
force disable X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD and to remove the broken update_pasid()
code to make this dysfunctional all over the place. Anything more
complex would require more surgery and none of the related functions
outside of the x86 core code are blatantly wrong, so removing those
would be overkill.

As nothing enables the PASID bit in the IA32_XSS MSR yet, which is
required to make this actually work, this cannot result in a regression
except for related out of tree train-wrecks, but they are broken already
today.

Fixes: 20f0afd1fb3d ("x86/mmu: Allocate/free a PASID")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mtsd6gr9.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de


# fb35d30f 22-Jan-2021 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Assign dedicated feature word for CPUID_0x8000001F[EAX]

Collect the scattered SME/SEV related feature flags into a dedicated
word. There are now five recognized features in CPUID.0x8000001F.EAX,
with at least one more on the horizon (SEV-SNP). Using a dedicated word
allows KVM to use its automagic CPUID adjustment logic when reporting
the set of supported features to userspace.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122204047.2860075-2-seanjc@google.com


# e7b6385b 12-Nov-2020 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel SGX hardware bits

Populate X86_FEATURE_SGX feature from CPUID and tie it to the Kconfig
option with disabled-features.h.

IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_ENABLE must be examined in addition to the CPUID
bits to enable full SGX support. The BIOS must both set this bit and lock
IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL for SGX to be supported (Intel SDM section 36.7.1).
The setting or clearing of this bit has no impact on the CPUID bits above,
which is why it needs to be detected separately.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112220135.165028-4-jarkko@kernel.org


# 1478b99a 15-Sep-2020 Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>

x86/cpufeatures: Mark ENQCMD as disabled when configured out

Currently, the ENQCMD feature depends on CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT. Add
X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD to the disabled features mask so that it gets
disabled when the IOMMU config option above is not enabled.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1600187413-163670-9-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com


# 45fc24e8 23-Jan-2020 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86/mpx: remove MPX from arch/x86

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

MPX is being removed from the kernel due to a lack of support
in the toolchain going forward (gcc).

This removes all the remaining (dead at this point) MPX handling
code remaining in the tree. The only remaining code is the XSAVE
support for MPX state which is currently needd for KVM to handle
VMs which might use MPX.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>


# b971880f 05-Nov-2019 Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>

x86/Kconfig: Rename UMIP config parameter

AMD 2nd generation EPYC processors support the UMIP (User-Mode
Instruction Prevention) feature. So, rename X86_INTEL_UMIP to
generic X86_UMIP and modify the text to cover both Intel and AMD.

[ bp: take of the disabled-features.h copy in tools/ too. ]

Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/157298912544.17462.2018334793891409521.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com


# dae0a105 19-Nov-2018 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>

x86/cpufeatures, x86/fault: Mark SMAP as disabled when configured out

Add X86_FEATURE_SMAP to the disabled features mask as appropriate
and use cpu_feature_enabled() in the fault code. This lets us get
rid of a redundant IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_SMAP).

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fe93332eded3d702f0b0b4cf83928d6830739ba3.1542667307.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# 95ca0ee8 25-Jan-2018 David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>

x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID_7_EDX CPUID leaf

This is a pure feature bits leaf. There are two AVX512 feature bits in it
already which were handled as scattered bits, and three more from this leaf
are going to be added for speculation control features.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: karahmed@amazon.de
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: gregkh@linux-foundation.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1516896855-7642-2-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk


# a89f040f 04-Dec-2017 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_BUG_CPU_INSECURE

Many x86 CPUs leak information to user space due to missing isolation of
user space and kernel space page tables. There are many well documented
ways to exploit that.

The upcoming software migitation of isolating the user and kernel space
page tables needs a misfeature flag so code can be made runtime
conditional.

Add the BUG bits which indicates that the CPU is affected and add a feature
bit which indicates that the software migitation is enabled.

Assume for now that _ALL_ x86 CPUs are affected by this. Exceptions can be
made later.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: aliguori@amazon.com
Cc: daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: keescook@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# 3522c2a6 05-Nov-2017 Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>

x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions

User-Mode Instruction Prevention is a security feature present in new
Intel processors that, when set, prevents the execution of a subset of
instructions if such instructions are executed in user mode (CPL > 0).
Attempting to execute such instructions causes a general protection
exception.

The subset of instructions comprises:

* SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
* SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
* SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
* SMSW - Store Machine Status Word
* STR - Store Task Register

This feature is also added to the list of disabled-features to allow
a cleaner handling of build-time configuration.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-7-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# cba4671a 29-Jun-2017 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>

x86/mm: Disable PCID on 32-bit kernels

32-bit kernels on new hardware will see PCID in CPUID, but PCID can
only be used in 64-bit mode. Rather than making all PCID code
conditional, just disable the feature on 32-bit builds.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2e391769192a4d31b808410c383c6bf0734bc6ea.1498751203.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# 3677d4c6 30-Mar-2017 Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

x86/boot: Detect 5-level paging support

In this initial implementation we force-require 5-level paging support
from the hardware, when compiled with CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y. (The kernel
will panic during boot on CPUs that don't support 5-level paging.)

We will implement boot-time switch between 4- and 5-level paging later.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170330080731.65421-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# 1e61f78b 29-Jun-2016 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86/cpufeature: Make sure DISABLED/REQUIRED macros are updated

x86 has two macros which allow us to evaluate some CPUID-based
features at compile time:

REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET()
DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET()

They're both defined by having the compiler check the bit
argument against some constant masks of features.

But, when adding new CPUID leaves, we need to check new words
for these macros. So make sure that those macros and the
REQUIRED_MASK* and DISABLED_MASK* get updated when necessary.

This looks kinda silly to have an open-coded value ("18" in
this case) open-coded in 5 places in the code. But, we really do
need 5 places updated when NCAPINTS gets bumped, so now we just
force the issue.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629200108.92466F6F@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# 6e17cb9c 29-Jun-2016 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86/cpufeature: Update cpufeaure macros

We had a new CPUID "NCAPINT" word added, but the REQUIRED_MASK and
DISABLED_MASK macros did not get updated. Update them.

None of the features was needed in these masks, so there was no
harm, but we should keep them updated anyway.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160629200107.8D3C9A31@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# e8df1a95 13-May-2016 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Fix broken compile-time disabling of pkeys

When I added support for the Memory Protection Keys processor
feature, I had to reindent the REQUIRED/DISABLED_MASK macros, and
also consult the later cpufeature words.

I'm not quite sure how I bungled it, but I consulted the wrong
word at the end. This only affected required or disabled cpu
features in cpufeature words 14, 15 and 16. So, only Protection
Keys itself was screwed over here.

The result was that if you disabled pkeys in your .config, you
might still see some code show up that should have been compiled
out. There should be no functional problems, though.

In verifying this patch I also realized that the DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE
macros were defined backwards and that the cpu_has() check in
setup_pku() was not doing the compile-time disabled checks.

So also fix the macro for DISABLE_PKU/OSPKE and add a compile-time
check for pkeys being enabled in setup_pku().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Fixes: dfb4a70f20c5 ("x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160513221328.C200930B@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# dfb4a70f 12-Feb-2016 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86/cpufeature, x86/mm/pkeys: Add protection keys related CPUID definitions

There are two CPUID bits for protection keys. One is for whether
the CPU contains the feature, and the other will appear set once
the OS enables protection keys. Specifically:

Bit 04: OSPKE. If 1, OS has set CR4.PKE to enable
Protection keys (and the RDPKRU/WRPKRU instructions)

This is because userspace can not see CR4 contents, but it can
see CPUID contents.

X86_FEATURE_PKU is referred to as "PKU" in the hardware documentation:

CPUID.(EAX=07H,ECX=0H):ECX.PKU [bit 3]

X86_FEATURE_OSPKE is "OSPKU":

CPUID.(EAX=07H,ECX=0H):ECX.OSPKE [bit 4]

These are the first CPU features which need to look at the
ECX word in CPUID leaf 0x7, so this patch also includes
fetching that word in to the cpuinfo->x86_capability[] array.

Add it to the disabled-features mask when its config option is
off. Even though we are not using it here, we also extend the
REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET() macro to keep it mirroring the
DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET() version.

This means that in almost all code, you should use:

cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PKU)

and *not* the CONFIG option.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160212210201.7714C250@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>


# 95290cf1 14-Nov-2014 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86, mpx: Add MPX to disabled features

This allows us to use cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX) as
both a runtime and compile-time check.

When CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX is disabled,
cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX) will evaluate at
compile-time to 0. If CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX=y, then the cpuid
flag will be checked at runtime.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114151823.B358EAD2@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>


# 9298b815 11-Sep-2014 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86: Add more disabled features

The original motivation for these patches was for an Intel CPU
feature called MPX. The patch to add a disabled feature for it
will go in with the other parts of the support.

But, in the meantime, there are a few other features than MPX
that we can make assumptions about at compile-time based on
compile options. Add them to disabled-features.h and check them
with cpu_feature_enabled().

Note that this gets rid of the last things that needed an #ifdef
CONFIG_X86_64 in cpufeature.h. Yay!

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140911211524.C0EC332A@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>


# 381aa07a 11-Sep-2014 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

x86: Introduce disabled-features

I believe the REQUIRED_MASK aproach was taken so that it was
easier to consult in assembly (arch/x86/kernel/verify_cpu.S).
DISABLED_MASK does not have the same restriction, but I
implemented it the same way for consistency.

We have a REQUIRED_MASK... which does two things:
1. Keeps a list of cpuid bits to check in very early boot and
refuse to boot if those are not present.
2. Consulted during cpu_has() checks, which allows us to
optimize out things at compile-time. In other words, if we
*KNOW* we will not boot with the feature off, then we can
safely assume that it will be present forever.

But, we don't have a similar mechanism for CPU features which
may be present but that we know we will not use. We simply
use our existing mechanisms to repeatedly check the status of
the bit at runtime (well, the alternatives patching helps here
but it does not provide compile-time optimization).

Adding a feature to disabled-features.h allows the bit to be
checked via a new macro: cpu_feature_enabled(). Note that
for features in DISABLED_MASK, checks with this macro have
all of the benefits of an #ifdef. Before, we would have done
this in a header:

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
#define cpu_has_mpx cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MPX)
#else
#define cpu_has_mpx 0
#endif

and this in the code:

if (cpu_has_mpx)
do_some_mpx_thing();

Now, just add your feature to DISABLED_MASK and you can do this
everywhere, and get the same benefits you would have from
#ifdefs:

if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX))
do_some_mpx_thing();

We need a new function and *not* a modification to cpu_has()
because there are cases where we actually need to check the CPU
itself, despite what features the kernel supports. The best
example of this is a hypervisor which has no control over what
features its guests are using and where the guest does not depend
on the host for support.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140911211513.9E35E931@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>