MFC r324348: MFV r316934: 7340 receive manual origin should override automatic origin

MFC r305209: MFV r302660: 6314 buffer overflow in dsl_dataset_name

illumos/illumos-gate@9adfa60d484ce2435f5af77cc99dcd4e692b6660
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/9adfa60d484ce2435f5af77cc99dcd4e6
92b6660

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6314
Callers of dsl_dataset_name pass a buffer of size ZFS_MAXNAMELEN, but
dsl_dataset_name copies the datasets' name PLUS the snapshot name to it,
resulting in a max of 2 * ZFS_MAXNAMELEN + '@'.

Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>

MFC r305202: MFV r302654:
6879 incorrect endianness swap for drr_spill.drr_length in libzfs_sendrecv.c

illumos/illumos-gate@20fea7a47472aceb64d3ed48cc2a3ea268bc4795
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/20fea7a47472aceb64d3ed48cc2a3ea26
8bc4795

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6879
In libzfs_sendrecv, there's a typo:
case DRR_SPILL:
if (byteswap) {
drr->drr_u.drr_write.drr_length =
BSWAP_64(drr->drr_u.drr_spill.drr_length);
}
Instead of drr_write.drr_length, we should be assigning the result of the
byteswap to drr_spill.drr_length.

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>

MFC r305201: MFV r302653:
6111 zfs send should ignore datasets created after the ending snapshot

illumos/illumos-gate@4a20c933b148de8a1c1d3538391c64284e636653
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/4a20c933b148de8a1c1d3538391c64284
e636653

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6111
If you create a zfs child folder, zfs send returns an error when a recursive
incremental send is done between two snapshots made prior to the folder
creation.
The problem can be reproduced with the following steps.
root@zfs:/# zfs create pool/test
root@zfs:/# zfs snapshot pool/test@snap1
root@zfs:/# zfs snapshot pool/test@snap2
root@zfs:/# zfs create pool/test/child
root@zfs:/# zfs send -R -I pool/test@snap1 pool/test@snap2 > /dev/null
WARNING: could not send pool/test/child@snap2: does not exist
WARNING: could not send pool/test/child@snap2: does not exist
root@zfs:/# echo $?
1
root@zfs:/# zfs snapshot -r pool/test@snap3
root@zfs:/# zfs send -R -I pool/test@snap1 pool/test@snap3 > /dev/null
root@zfs:/# echo $?
0
root@zfs:/# zfs send -R -I pool/test@snap2 pool/test@snap3 > /dev/null
root@zfs:/# echo $?
0
Since pool/test/child was created after snap2, zfs send should not expect snap2
to be in pool/test/child when doing a recursive send. It should examine the
compare the creation time of the snapshot and each child folder to decide if
the folder will be sent. The next incremental send between snap2 and snap3
would properly create the child folder and snap3 which first appears in the
child folder.
The problem is identical if '-i' is used instead of '-I'.

Reviewed by: Alex Aizman alex.aizman@nexenta.com
Reviewed by: Alek Pinchuk alek.pinchuk@nexenta.com
Reviewed by: Roman Strashkin roman.strashkin@nexenta.com
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org>
Author: Alex Deiter <alex.deiter@nexenta.com>

MFC r305207: MFV r302659: 6931 lib/libzfs: cleanup gcc warnings

illumos/illumos-gate@88f61dee20b358671b1b643e9d1dbf220a1d69be
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/88f61dee20b358671b1b643e9d1dbf220a1d69be

https://www.illumos.org/issues/6931
need cleanup:
CERRWARN += -_gcc=-Wno-switch
CERRWARN += -_gcc=-Wno-parentheses
CERRWARN += -_gcc=-Wno-unused-function

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov@gmail.com>

MFC r305195: MFV r302643:
6902 speed up listing of snapshots if requesting name only and sorting by name

This was our change from the beginning, so just reduce the upstream diff.

MFC r297520: zfs receive: -u can be ignored sometimes

PR: 204705

MFC r296528: MFV r296527: 6659 nvlist_free(NULL) is a no-op

Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Reviewed by: Marcel Telka <marcel@telka.sk>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>

illumos/illumos-gate@aab83bb83be7342f6cfccaed8d5fe0b2f404855d

MFC r296519: MFV r296518: 5027 zfs large block support (add copyright)

Author: Matthew Ahrens <matt@mahrens.org>

illumos/illumos-gate@c3d26abc9ee97b4f60233556aadeb57e0bd30bb9

MFC r294817: MFV r294816:
4986 receiving replication stream fails if any snapshot exceeds refquota

Reviewed by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gordon.ross@nexenta.com>
Author: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>

illumos/illumos-gate@5878fad70d76d8711f6608c1f80b0447601261c6

MFC r277300 (by smh): Mechanically convert cddl sun #ifdef's to illumos

Since the upstream for cddl code is now illumos not sun, mechanically
convert all sun #ifdef's to illumos #ifdef's which have been used in all
newer code for some time.

Also do a manual pass to correct the use if #ifdef comments as per style(9)
as well as few uses of #if defined(__FreeBSD__) vs #ifndef illumos.

MFC r289422:
4185 add new cryptographic checksums to ZFS: SHA-512, Skein, Edon-R

Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Saso Kiselkov <saso.kiselkov@nexenta.com>
Reviewed by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>

illumos/illumos-gate@45818ee124adeaaf947698996b4f4c722afc6d1f

This is only a partial merge of respective ZFS infrastructure changes.
At this moment FreeBSD kernel has no those crypto algorithms, so the
parts of the code to enable them are commented out. When they are
implemented, it will be trivial to plug them in.

MFC r289362, r289445: 2605 want to resume interrupted zfs send

Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Richard Elling <Richard.Elling@RichardElling.com>
Reviewed by: Xin Li <delphij@freebsd.org>
Reviewed by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>

illumos/illumos-gate@9c3fd1216fa7fb02cfbc78a2518a686d54b48ab8

For more info, see:
- slides http://www.slideshare.net/MatthewAhrens/openzfs-send-and-receive
- video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY44jPMvxog
- manpage changes (for zfs resume -s and zfs send -t)
- upcoming talk at the OpenZFS Developer Summit

The TL;DR is:
Use "zfs receive -s" to save the partially received state on failure.
On failure, get the receive token with "zfs get receive_resume_token <fs>"
Resume the send with "zfs send -t <token_value>"

Relnotes: yes

MFC r289313: 5764 "zfs send -nv" directs output to stderr

Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <paul.dagnelie@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Basil Crow <basil.crow@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Reviewed by: Bayard Bell <buffer.g.overflow@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Author: Manoj Joseph <manoj.joseph@delphix.com>

illumos/illumos-gate@dc5f28a3c341db7c241bba77ddc109c141072f27

MFC r286705: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks
5925 zfs receive -o origin=

Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>

While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a
read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write()
and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect
blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write().

Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the
stream does not mark it as a clone.

MFC r286587: 5746 more checksumming in zfs send

Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Bayard Bell <buffer.g.overflow@gmail.com>
Approved by: Albert Lee <trisk@omniti.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>

illumos/illumos-gate@98110f08fa182032082d98be2ddb9391fcd62bf1

MFC r274337,r274673,274681,r275515:

ZFS large block support. The default recordsize remains at 128KB.

A new tunable/sysctl variable, vfs.zfs.max_recordsize is added to
allow adjusting the permitted maximum record size, or
zfs_max_recordsize, with a default of 1MB. ZFS will not allow
setting recordsize greater than zfs_max_recordsize as a safety
belt, because larger recordsize means greater read and write
latency and more memory usage.

Please note that booting from datasets that have recordsize greater
than 128KB is not supported (but it's Okay to enable the feature on
the pool).

Limited safety belt is provided for mounted root filesystem but use
caution when using a larger value.

Illumos issue:
5027 zfs large block support

MFC r268075: MFV r267565:

4757 ZFS embedded-data block pointers ("zero block compression")
4913 zfs release should not be subject to space checks

MFC r260183: MFV r260154 + 260182:

4369 implement zfs bookmarks
4368 zfs send filesystems from readonly pools

Illumos/illumos-gate@78f171005391b928aaf1642b3206c534ed644332

MFC r286705: 5960 zfs recv should prefetch indirect blocks
5925 zfs receive -o origin=

Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Author: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>

While running 'zfs recv' we noticed that every 128th 8K block required a
read. We were seeing that restore_write() was calling dmu_tx_hold_write()
and the indirect block was not cached. We should prefetch upcoming indirect
blocks to avoid having to go to disk and blocking the restore_write().

Allow an incremental send stream to be received as a clone, even if the
stream does not mark it as a clone.

MFC r286587: 5746 more checksumming in zfs send

Reviewed by: Christopher Siden <christopher.siden@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Bayard Bell <buffer.g.overflow@gmail.com>
Approved by: Albert Lee <trisk@omniti.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>

illumos/illumos-gate@98110f08fa182032082d98be2ddb9391fcd62bf1

MFC r274337,r274673,274681,r275515:

ZFS large block support. The default recordsize remains at 128KB.

A new tunable/sysctl variable, vfs.zfs.max_recordsize is added to
allow adjusting the permitted maximum record size, or
zfs_max_recordsize, with a default of 1MB. ZFS will not allow
setting recordsize greater than zfs_max_recordsize as a safety
belt, because larger recordsize means greater read and write
latency and more memory usage.

Please note that booting from datasets that have recordsize greater
than 128KB is not supported (but it's Okay to enable the feature on
the pool).

Limited safety belt is provided for mounted root filesystem but use
caution when using a larger value.

Illumos issue:
5027 zfs large block support

MFC r268075: MFV r267565:

4757 ZFS embedded-data block pointers ("zero block compression")
4913 zfs release should not be subject to space checks

MFC r260183: MFV r260154 + 260182:

4369 implement zfs bookmarks
4368 zfs send filesystems from readonly pools

Illumos/illumos-gate@78f171005391b928aaf1642b3206c534ed644332