InstructionSelect.cpp revision 360784
1//===- llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/InstructionSelect.cpp - InstructionSelect ---==//
2//
3// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
4// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
5// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
6//
7//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
8/// \file
9/// This file implements the InstructionSelect class.
10//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
11
12#include "llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/InstructionSelect.h"
13#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h"
14#include "llvm/ADT/Twine.h"
15#include "llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/GISelKnownBits.h"
16#include "llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/InstructionSelector.h"
17#include "llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerInfo.h"
18#include "llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.h"
19#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter.h"
20#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h"
21#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
22#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetInstrInfo.h"
23#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetLowering.h"
24#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetPassConfig.h"
25#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetSubtargetInfo.h"
26#include "llvm/Config/config.h"
27#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
28#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
29#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
30#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
31#include "llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h"
32
33#define DEBUG_TYPE "instruction-select"
34
35using namespace llvm;
36
37#ifdef LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX
38static cl::opt<std::string>
39    CoveragePrefix("gisel-coverage-prefix", cl::init(LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX),
40                   cl::desc("Record GlobalISel rule coverage files of this "
41                            "prefix if instrumentation was generated"));
42#else
43static const std::string CoveragePrefix = "";
44#endif
45
46char InstructionSelect::ID = 0;
47INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(InstructionSelect, DEBUG_TYPE,
48                      "Select target instructions out of generic instructions",
49                      false, false)
50INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetPassConfig)
51INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(GISelKnownBitsAnalysis)
52INITIALIZE_PASS_END(InstructionSelect, DEBUG_TYPE,
53                    "Select target instructions out of generic instructions",
54                    false, false)
55
56InstructionSelect::InstructionSelect() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) { }
57
58void InstructionSelect::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
59  AU.addRequired<TargetPassConfig>();
60  AU.addRequired<GISelKnownBitsAnalysis>();
61  AU.addPreserved<GISelKnownBitsAnalysis>();
62  getSelectionDAGFallbackAnalysisUsage(AU);
63  MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
64}
65
66bool InstructionSelect::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
67  // If the ISel pipeline failed, do not bother running that pass.
68  if (MF.getProperties().hasProperty(
69          MachineFunctionProperties::Property::FailedISel))
70    return false;
71
72  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Selecting function: " << MF.getName() << '\n');
73  GISelKnownBits &KB = getAnalysis<GISelKnownBitsAnalysis>().get(MF);
74
75  const TargetPassConfig &TPC = getAnalysis<TargetPassConfig>();
76  InstructionSelector *ISel = MF.getSubtarget().getInstructionSelector();
77  CodeGenCoverage CoverageInfo;
78  assert(ISel && "Cannot work without InstructionSelector");
79  ISel->setupMF(MF, KB, CoverageInfo);
80
81  // An optimization remark emitter. Used to report failures.
82  MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter MORE(MF, /*MBFI=*/nullptr);
83
84  // FIXME: There are many other MF/MFI fields we need to initialize.
85
86  MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = MF.getRegInfo();
87#ifndef NDEBUG
88  // Check that our input is fully legal: we require the function to have the
89  // Legalized property, so it should be.
90  // FIXME: This should be in the MachineVerifier, as the RegBankSelected
91  // property check already is.
92  if (!DisableGISelLegalityCheck)
93    if (const MachineInstr *MI = machineFunctionIsIllegal(MF)) {
94      reportGISelFailure(MF, TPC, MORE, "gisel-select",
95                         "instruction is not legal", *MI);
96      return false;
97    }
98  // FIXME: We could introduce new blocks and will need to fix the outer loop.
99  // Until then, keep track of the number of blocks to assert that we don't.
100  const size_t NumBlocks = MF.size();
101#endif
102
103  for (MachineBasicBlock *MBB : post_order(&MF)) {
104    if (MBB->empty())
105      continue;
106
107    // Select instructions in reverse block order. We permit erasing so have
108    // to resort to manually iterating and recognizing the begin (rend) case.
109    bool ReachedBegin = false;
110    for (auto MII = std::prev(MBB->end()), Begin = MBB->begin();
111         !ReachedBegin;) {
112#ifndef NDEBUG
113      // Keep track of the insertion range for debug printing.
114      const auto AfterIt = std::next(MII);
115#endif
116      // Select this instruction.
117      MachineInstr &MI = *MII;
118
119      // And have our iterator point to the next instruction, if there is one.
120      if (MII == Begin)
121        ReachedBegin = true;
122      else
123        --MII;
124
125      LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Selecting: \n  " << MI);
126
127      // We could have folded this instruction away already, making it dead.
128      // If so, erase it.
129      if (isTriviallyDead(MI, MRI)) {
130        LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Is dead; erasing.\n");
131        MI.eraseFromParentAndMarkDBGValuesForRemoval();
132        continue;
133      }
134
135      if (!ISel->select(MI)) {
136        // FIXME: It would be nice to dump all inserted instructions.  It's
137        // not obvious how, esp. considering select() can insert after MI.
138        reportGISelFailure(MF, TPC, MORE, "gisel-select", "cannot select", MI);
139        return false;
140      }
141
142      // Dump the range of instructions that MI expanded into.
143      LLVM_DEBUG({
144        auto InsertedBegin = ReachedBegin ? MBB->begin() : std::next(MII);
145        dbgs() << "Into:\n";
146        for (auto &InsertedMI : make_range(InsertedBegin, AfterIt))
147          dbgs() << "  " << InsertedMI;
148        dbgs() << '\n';
149      });
150    }
151  }
152
153  for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) {
154    if (MBB.empty())
155      continue;
156
157    // Try to find redundant copies b/w vregs of the same register class.
158    bool ReachedBegin = false;
159    for (auto MII = std::prev(MBB.end()), Begin = MBB.begin(); !ReachedBegin;) {
160      // Select this instruction.
161      MachineInstr &MI = *MII;
162
163      // And have our iterator point to the next instruction, if there is one.
164      if (MII == Begin)
165        ReachedBegin = true;
166      else
167        --MII;
168      if (MI.getOpcode() != TargetOpcode::COPY)
169        continue;
170      Register SrcReg = MI.getOperand(1).getReg();
171      Register DstReg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
172      if (Register::isVirtualRegister(SrcReg) &&
173          Register::isVirtualRegister(DstReg)) {
174        auto SrcRC = MRI.getRegClass(SrcReg);
175        auto DstRC = MRI.getRegClass(DstReg);
176        if (SrcRC == DstRC) {
177          MRI.replaceRegWith(DstReg, SrcReg);
178          MI.eraseFromParentAndMarkDBGValuesForRemoval();
179        }
180      }
181    }
182  }
183
184#ifndef NDEBUG
185  const TargetRegisterInfo &TRI = *MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
186  // Now that selection is complete, there are no more generic vregs.  Verify
187  // that the size of the now-constrained vreg is unchanged and that it has a
188  // register class.
189  for (unsigned I = 0, E = MRI.getNumVirtRegs(); I != E; ++I) {
190    unsigned VReg = Register::index2VirtReg(I);
191
192    MachineInstr *MI = nullptr;
193    if (!MRI.def_empty(VReg))
194      MI = &*MRI.def_instr_begin(VReg);
195    else if (!MRI.use_empty(VReg))
196      MI = &*MRI.use_instr_begin(VReg);
197    if (!MI)
198      continue;
199
200    const TargetRegisterClass *RC = MRI.getRegClassOrNull(VReg);
201    if (!RC) {
202      reportGISelFailure(MF, TPC, MORE, "gisel-select",
203                         "VReg has no regclass after selection", *MI);
204      return false;
205    }
206
207    const LLT Ty = MRI.getType(VReg);
208    if (Ty.isValid() && Ty.getSizeInBits() > TRI.getRegSizeInBits(*RC)) {
209      reportGISelFailure(
210          MF, TPC, MORE, "gisel-select",
211          "VReg's low-level type and register class have different sizes", *MI);
212      return false;
213    }
214  }
215
216  if (MF.size() != NumBlocks) {
217    MachineOptimizationRemarkMissed R("gisel-select", "GISelFailure",
218                                      MF.getFunction().getSubprogram(),
219                                      /*MBB=*/nullptr);
220    R << "inserting blocks is not supported yet";
221    reportGISelFailure(MF, TPC, MORE, R);
222    return false;
223  }
224#endif
225  auto &TLI = *MF.getSubtarget().getTargetLowering();
226  TLI.finalizeLowering(MF);
227
228  // Determine if there are any calls in this machine function. Ported from
229  // SelectionDAG.
230  MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
231  for (const auto &MBB : MF) {
232    if (MFI.hasCalls() && MF.hasInlineAsm())
233      break;
234
235    for (const auto &MI : MBB) {
236      if ((MI.isCall() && !MI.isReturn()) || MI.isStackAligningInlineAsm())
237        MFI.setHasCalls(true);
238      if (MI.isInlineAsm())
239        MF.setHasInlineAsm(true);
240    }
241  }
242
243
244  LLVM_DEBUG({
245    dbgs() << "Rules covered by selecting function: " << MF.getName() << ":";
246    for (auto RuleID : CoverageInfo.covered())
247      dbgs() << " id" << RuleID;
248    dbgs() << "\n\n";
249  });
250  CoverageInfo.emit(CoveragePrefix,
251                    MF.getSubtarget()
252                        .getTargetLowering()
253                        ->getTargetMachine()
254                        .getTarget()
255                        .getBackendName());
256
257  // If we successfully selected the function nothing is going to use the vreg
258  // types after us (otherwise MIRPrinter would need them). Make sure the types
259  // disappear.
260  MRI.clearVirtRegTypes();
261
262  // FIXME: Should we accurately track changes?
263  return true;
264}
265