README.y2k revision 41142
141142Sobrien# -*- text -*- 241142Sobrien AM-UTILS YEAR-2000 COMPLIANCE 341142Sobrien 441142SobrienMost likely am-utils is y2k compliant. 541142Sobrien 641142SobrienI do not know for sure because I have not certified am-utils myself, nor do 741142SobrienI have the time for it. I do not think that amd will be affected by y2k at 841142Sobrienall, because it does not do anything with dates other than print the date on 941142Sobrienthe log file, in whatever format is provided by your os/libc --- especially 1041142Sobrienthe ctime(3) call. 1141142Sobrien 1241142SobrienHowever, on Friday, September 18th 1998, Matthew Crosby <mcrosby@ms.com> 1341142Sobrienreported that they evaluated 6.0a16 and found it to be compliant. 1441142Sobrien 1541142SobrienErez Zadok. 1641142SobrienMaintainer, am-utils package and AMD-DEV list. 1741142SobrienEmail: amd-dev-owner@majordomo.cs.columbia.edu 1841142SobrienWWW: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/am-utils/ 19