Searched hist:191882 (Results 1 - 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
/freebsd-10-stable/lib/libc/gen/ | ||
H A D | tcsetsid.3 | 191882 Thu May 07 11:53:32 MDT 2009 ed Add tcsetsid(3). The entire world seems to use the non-standard TIOCSCTTY ioctl to make a TTY a controlling terminal of a session. Even though tcsetsid(3) is also non-standard, I think it's a lot better to use in our own source code, mainly because it's similar to tcsetpgrp(), tcgetpgrp() and tcgetsid(). I stole the idea from QNX. They do it the other way around; their TIOCSCTTY is just a wrapper around tcsetsid(). tcsetsid() then calls into an IPC framework. |
H A D | tcgetsid.3 | diff 191882 Thu May 07 11:53:32 MDT 2009 ed Add tcsetsid(3). The entire world seems to use the non-standard TIOCSCTTY ioctl to make a TTY a controlling terminal of a session. Even though tcsetsid(3) is also non-standard, I think it's a lot better to use in our own source code, mainly because it's similar to tcsetpgrp(), tcgetpgrp() and tcgetsid(). I stole the idea from QNX. They do it the other way around; their TIOCSCTTY is just a wrapper around tcsetsid(). tcsetsid() then calls into an IPC framework. |
/freebsd-10-stable/lib/libutil/ | ||
H A D | login_tty.c | diff 191882 Thu May 07 11:53:32 MDT 2009 ed Add tcsetsid(3). The entire world seems to use the non-standard TIOCSCTTY ioctl to make a TTY a controlling terminal of a session. Even though tcsetsid(3) is also non-standard, I think it's a lot better to use in our own source code, mainly because it's similar to tcsetpgrp(), tcgetpgrp() and tcgetsid(). I stole the idea from QNX. They do it the other way around; their TIOCSCTTY is just a wrapper around tcsetsid(). tcsetsid() then calls into an IPC framework. |
/freebsd-10-stable/sys/sys/ | ||
H A D | termios.h | diff 191882 Thu May 07 11:53:32 MDT 2009 ed Add tcsetsid(3). The entire world seems to use the non-standard TIOCSCTTY ioctl to make a TTY a controlling terminal of a session. Even though tcsetsid(3) is also non-standard, I think it's a lot better to use in our own source code, mainly because it's similar to tcsetpgrp(), tcgetpgrp() and tcgetsid(). I stole the idea from QNX. They do it the other way around; their TIOCSCTTY is just a wrapper around tcsetsid(). tcsetsid() then calls into an IPC framework. |
H A D | _termios.h | diff 191882 Thu May 07 11:53:32 MDT 2009 ed Add tcsetsid(3). The entire world seems to use the non-standard TIOCSCTTY ioctl to make a TTY a controlling terminal of a session. Even though tcsetsid(3) is also non-standard, I think it's a lot better to use in our own source code, mainly because it's similar to tcsetpgrp(), tcgetpgrp() and tcgetsid(). I stole the idea from QNX. They do it the other way around; their TIOCSCTTY is just a wrapper around tcsetsid(). tcsetsid() then calls into an IPC framework. |
/freebsd-10-stable/include/ | ||
H A D | termios.h | diff 191882 Thu May 07 11:53:32 MDT 2009 ed Add tcsetsid(3). The entire world seems to use the non-standard TIOCSCTTY ioctl to make a TTY a controlling terminal of a session. Even though tcsetsid(3) is also non-standard, I think it's a lot better to use in our own source code, mainly because it's similar to tcsetpgrp(), tcgetpgrp() and tcgetsid(). I stole the idea from QNX. They do it the other way around; their TIOCSCTTY is just a wrapper around tcsetsid(). tcsetsid() then calls into an IPC framework. |
Completed in 133 milliseconds