Searched hist:94778 (Results 1 - 3 of 3) sorted by last modified time

/freebsd-10.1-release/
H A DMAINTAINERSdiff 94778 Mon Apr 15 14:01:41 MDT 2002 imp Add my level of stuff preference to MAINTAINERS
/freebsd-10.1-release/sys/sparc64/sparc64/
H A Dexception.Sdiff 157825 Mon Apr 17 19:03:24 MDT 2006 marius - Since critical sections no longer raise the processor interrupt level to
above what's used for fast interrupts, only interrupts with the level of
the interrupt which led to calling intr_fast() (which is used with both
fast and ithread interrupts) are blocked while in that function. Thus
intr_fast() can be preempted by a fast interrupt (which are of a higher
level than ithread interrupts) while servicing an ithread interrupt. This
can lead to a stale pointer to the head of the active interrupt requests
list when back in the ithread interrupt invocation of intr_fast(), in turn
resulting in corruption of the interrupt request lists and consequently
in a panic. Solve this be turning off interrupts in intr_fast() before
reading the pointer to the head of the active list rather than after. [1]
- Add a KASSERT in intr_fast() which asserts that ir_func is non-zero before
calling it. [1]
- Increment interrupt stats after calling the handlers rather than before.
This reduces the delay until direct and fast handlers are serviced, in my
testings by 30% on average for the direct tick interrupt handler, in turn
resulting in less clock drift.

PR: 94778 [1]
Submitted by: Andrew Belashov [1]
MFC after: 2 weeks
H A Dinterrupt.Sdiff 157825 Mon Apr 17 19:03:24 MDT 2006 marius - Since critical sections no longer raise the processor interrupt level to
above what's used for fast interrupts, only interrupts with the level of
the interrupt which led to calling intr_fast() (which is used with both
fast and ithread interrupts) are blocked while in that function. Thus
intr_fast() can be preempted by a fast interrupt (which are of a higher
level than ithread interrupts) while servicing an ithread interrupt. This
can lead to a stale pointer to the head of the active interrupt requests
list when back in the ithread interrupt invocation of intr_fast(), in turn
resulting in corruption of the interrupt request lists and consequently
in a panic. Solve this be turning off interrupts in intr_fast() before
reading the pointer to the head of the active list rather than after. [1]
- Add a KASSERT in intr_fast() which asserts that ir_func is non-zero before
calling it. [1]
- Increment interrupt stats after calling the handlers rather than before.
This reduces the delay until direct and fast handlers are serviced, in my
testings by 30% on average for the direct tick interrupt handler, in turn
resulting in less clock drift.

PR: 94778 [1]
Submitted by: Andrew Belashov [1]
MFC after: 2 weeks

Completed in 99 milliseconds