Searched hist:202274 (Results 1 - 5 of 5) sorted by relevance

/freebsd-10.1-release/lib/libc/gen/
H A Dttyslot.cdiff 202274 Thu Jan 14 03:40:05 MST 2010 ed Phase out ttyslot(3).

The ttyslot() function was originally part for SUSv1, marked LEGACY in
SUSv2 and removed later on. This function only makes sense when using
utmp(5), because it was used to determine the offset of the record for
the controlling TTY. It makes little sense to keep it here, because the
new utmpx file format doesn't index based on TTY slots.
H A Dttyname.3diff 202274 Thu Jan 14 03:40:05 MST 2010 ed Phase out ttyslot(3).

The ttyslot() function was originally part for SUSv1, marked LEGACY in
SUSv2 and removed later on. This function only makes sense when using
utmp(5), because it was used to determine the offset of the record for
the controlling TTY. It makes little sense to keep it here, because the
new utmpx file format doesn't index based on TTY slots.
H A DSymbol.mapdiff 202274 Thu Jan 14 03:40:05 MST 2010 ed Phase out ttyslot(3).

The ttyslot() function was originally part for SUSv1, marked LEGACY in
SUSv2 and removed later on. This function only makes sense when using
utmp(5), because it was used to determine the offset of the record for
the controlling TTY. It makes little sense to keep it here, because the
new utmpx file format doesn't index based on TTY slots.
/freebsd-10.1-release/libexec/getty/
H A Dttys.5diff 202274 Thu Jan 14 03:40:05 MST 2010 ed Phase out ttyslot(3).

The ttyslot() function was originally part for SUSv1, marked LEGACY in
SUSv2 and removed later on. This function only makes sense when using
utmp(5), because it was used to determine the offset of the record for
the controlling TTY. It makes little sense to keep it here, because the
new utmpx file format doesn't index based on TTY slots.
/freebsd-10.1-release/include/
H A Dunistd.hdiff 202274 Thu Jan 14 03:40:05 MST 2010 ed Phase out ttyslot(3).

The ttyslot() function was originally part for SUSv1, marked LEGACY in
SUSv2 and removed later on. This function only makes sense when using
utmp(5), because it was used to determine the offset of the record for
the controlling TTY. It makes little sense to keep it here, because the
new utmpx file format doesn't index based on TTY slots.

Completed in 193 milliseconds