Searched hist:123504 (Results 1 - 2 of 2) sorted by last modified time
| /freebsd-10.0-release/sys/compat/ndis/ | ||
| H A D | subr_ndis.c | diff 123504 Fri Dec 12 20:35:13 MST 2003 wpaul Implement some more NDIS and ntoskrnl API calls: subr_ndis.c: NdisGetCurrentSystemTime() which, according to the Microsoft documentation returns "the number of 100 nanosecond intervals since January 1, 1601." I have no idea what's so special about that epoch or why they chose 100 nanosecond ticks. I don't know the proper offset to convert nanotime() from the UNIX epoch to January 1, 1601, so for now I'm just doing the unit convertion to 100s of nanoseconds. subr_ntoskrnl.c: memcpy(), memset(), ExInterlockedPopEntrySList(), ExInterlockedPushEntrySList(). The latter two are different from InterlockedPopEntrySList() and InterlockedPushEntrySList() in that they accept a spinlock to hold while executing, whereas the non-Ex routines use a lock internal to ntoskrnl. I also modified ExInitializePagedLookasideList() and ExInitializeNPagedLookasideList() to initialize mutex locks within the lookaside structures. It seems that in NDIS 5.0, the lookaside allocate/free routines ExInterlockedPopEntrySList() and ExInterlockedPushEntrySList(), which require the use of the per-lookaside spinlock, whereas in NDIS 5.1, the per-lookaside spinlock is deprecated. We need to support both cases. Note that I appear to be doing something wrong with ExInterlockedPopEntrySList() and ExInterlockedPushEntrySList(): they don't appear to obtain proper pointers to their arguments, so I'm probably doing something wrong in terms of their calling convention (they're declared to be FASTCALL in Widnows, and I'm not sure what that means for gcc). It happens that in my stub lookaside implementation, they don't need to do any work anyway, so for now I've hacked them to always return NULL, which avoids corrupting the stack. I need to do this right though. |
| H A D | subr_ntoskrnl.c | diff 123504 Fri Dec 12 20:35:13 MST 2003 wpaul Implement some more NDIS and ntoskrnl API calls: subr_ndis.c: NdisGetCurrentSystemTime() which, according to the Microsoft documentation returns "the number of 100 nanosecond intervals since January 1, 1601." I have no idea what's so special about that epoch or why they chose 100 nanosecond ticks. I don't know the proper offset to convert nanotime() from the UNIX epoch to January 1, 1601, so for now I'm just doing the unit convertion to 100s of nanoseconds. subr_ntoskrnl.c: memcpy(), memset(), ExInterlockedPopEntrySList(), ExInterlockedPushEntrySList(). The latter two are different from InterlockedPopEntrySList() and InterlockedPushEntrySList() in that they accept a spinlock to hold while executing, whereas the non-Ex routines use a lock internal to ntoskrnl. I also modified ExInitializePagedLookasideList() and ExInitializeNPagedLookasideList() to initialize mutex locks within the lookaside structures. It seems that in NDIS 5.0, the lookaside allocate/free routines ExInterlockedPopEntrySList() and ExInterlockedPushEntrySList(), which require the use of the per-lookaside spinlock, whereas in NDIS 5.1, the per-lookaside spinlock is deprecated. We need to support both cases. Note that I appear to be doing something wrong with ExInterlockedPopEntrySList() and ExInterlockedPushEntrySList(): they don't appear to obtain proper pointers to their arguments, so I'm probably doing something wrong in terms of their calling convention (they're declared to be FASTCALL in Widnows, and I'm not sure what that means for gcc). It happens that in my stub lookaside implementation, they don't need to do any work anyway, so for now I've hacked them to always return NULL, which avoids corrupting the stack. I need to do this right though. |
Completed in 79 milliseconds